JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)March 29, 2017

A- de 2017

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez

✓Claimant William Florez Noriega

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de nulidad de la Sentencia SU.406/16, formulada por el apoderado judicial de Médicos Asociados S.A.

Tras comprobar el incumplimiento del requisito de legitimación por activa del peticionario, en tanto no fue parte del proceso de tutela que dio lugar a la sentencia de unificación cuestionada, ni un tercero que resultó afectado con la decisión que en ella se adoptó, la Sala decide RECHAZAR, por improcedente, la nulidad invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de nulidad presentada por Medicos Asociados S.A. contra la Sentencia SU-406 de 2016.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNIQUESE la presente providencia al peticionario, advirtiendose que contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.